翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ 1965 SANFL Grand Final
・ 1965 SANFL season
・ 1965 Scotch Cup
・ 1965 Scottish League Cup Final
・ 1965 Six Hour Le Mans
・ 1965 Skyways Coach-Air Avro 748 crash
・ 1965 Sligo Senior Football Championship
・ 1965 South Africa rugby union tour of Australasia
・ 1965 South Africa rugby union tour of Scotland and Ireland
・ 1965 South African Grand Prix
・ 1965 South American Championships in Athletics
・ 1965 South Vietnamese coup
・ 1965 Southeast Asian Peninsular Games
・ 1965 Southern 500
・ 1965 Southern Conference Men's Basketball Tournament
1965 Soviet economic reform
・ 1965 Soviet nuclear tests
・ 1965 Soviet Top League
・ 1965 Speedway World Team Cup
・ 1965 Spring Trophy
・ 1965 St. Louis Cardinals (NFL) season
・ 1965 St. Louis Cardinals season
・ 1965 Stanford Indians football team
・ 1965 Stanley Cup Finals
・ 1965 Star World Championships
・ 1965 Sugar Bowl
・ 1965 Summer Universiade
・ 1965 Sun Bowl
・ 1965 Sunday Mirror Trophy
・ 1965 Swedish football Division 2


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

1965 Soviet economic reform : ウィキペディア英語版
1965 Soviet economic reform

The 1965 Soviet economic reform, sometimes called the Kosygin reform or Liberman reform, were a set of planned changes in the economy of the Soviet Union (USSR). A centerpiece of these changes was the introduction of profitability and sales as the two key indicators of enterprise success. Some of an enterprise's profits would go to three funds, used to reward workers and expand operations; most would go to the central budget.
The reforms were introduced politically by Alexei Kosygin—who had just become Premier of the Soviet Union following the removal of Nikita Khrushchev—and ratified by the Central Committee in September 1965. They reflected some long-simmering wishes of the USSR's mathematically oriented elite planners, and initiated the shift towards a more decentralized yet detailed and computerized economic planning process.
== Background ==

Under Lenin, the New Economic Policy had allowed and used the concepts of profit and incentives for regulation of the Soviet economy. Stalin transformed this policy rapidly with the collectivization of farms and the acceleration of central planning—as exemplified by "Five-Year Plans".〔Katz, ''Economic Reform'' (1972), pp. 8–17.〕 Since about 1930, the Soviet Union had used a centralized system to manage its economy. In this system, a single bureaucracy created economic plans, which assigned workers to jobs, set wages, dictated resource allocation, established the levels of trade with other countries, and planned the course of technological progress. Retail prices for consumer goods were fixed at levels intended to clear the market. The prices of wholesale goods were fixed, also, but these served an accounting function more than a market mechanism. Collective farms also paid centrally determined prices for the supplies they needed, and unlike other sectors their workers received wages directly dependent on the profitability of the operation.〔Adam, ''Economic Reforms'' (1989), pp. 5–11.〕
Although Soviet enterprises were theoretically governed by the principle of ''khozraschet'' ("accountability")—which required them to meet planners' expectations within the system of set prices for their inputs and outputs—they had little control over the biggest decisions affecting their operations.〔Adam, ''Economic Reforms'' (1989), pp. 11–13.〕 Managers did have a responsibility to plan future gross output, which they chronically underestimated in order to later exceed the prediction.〔 The managers then received bonuses (''premia'') for surplus product regardless of whether it was produced in a cost-effective manner or whether their enterprise was profitable overall. The bonuses for output came in amounts sometimes equal to the managers' basic salaries. The system also incentivized pointless increases in the size, weight, and cost of production outputs, simply because 'more' had been produced.〔Tubis, ''Decision-Making in the Soviet Economic Bureaucracy'' (1973), pp. 22–27. "The amount of premia was determined on the basis of the fulfillment of the norms for each plan index, and a certain rate was established for fulfillment and higher rates for overfulfillment of each norm. Since gross output was considered the most important index by the leadership, it carried with it the highest rates. The manipulation of these bonuses was very important because management personnel oriented production to get the most favorable sums, especially since the premia often amounted to a sum equal to the manager's regular salary. Moreover, whereas bonuses for workers and lower management personnel, e.g., a shop chief, were paid out of the enterprise fund made up of a part of the enterprise profit, the bonuses of the managerial personnel were, for the most part, paid out of the State budget. Thus, the premia of the manager and his staff came from fulfilling the production plan regardless of how the enterprise did financially."〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「1965 Soviet economic reform」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.